Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Thursday, 8 August 2013

!MEDIA ALERT: September 11, 2012 - Smith Experts Available to Comment on Latest Kodak Moves to Exit Bankruptcy

Media Alert: Sept. 10, 2012

Smith Experts Available to Comment on Latest Kodak
Moves to Exit Bankruptcy

COLLEGE PARK, Md. – Faculty experts in the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business are available to discuss, and give historical perspective on, the recently announced Kodak-management changes and job cuts as the company maneuvers to emerge from bankruptcy protection.

The Smith School has an in-house facility for live or taped interviews via fiber-optic line for television or multimedia content.

Kodak Misses its Moment

Hank Lucas, the Robert H. Smith Professor of Information systems, has written Searching for Survival: Lessons from Disruptive Technologies (Praeger, 2012). Contact him at 301-405-0100 or hlucas@rhsmith.umd.edu. 

Lucas’ book includes a chapter "Kodak Misses its Moment." He summarizes it here:

“Kodak is a tragic example of a company that had everything going for it, but was unable to cope when innovative digital technologies came along. Kodak’s demise was brought about not by a single event, but as with many disasters, a series of conditions and events brought the company down." These include:

Kodak’s own invention of the digital camera in 1975The firm’s inability to understand that others flooding the market with digital cameras, combined with the Internet, changed the process by which people captured and shared images The company’s rigid bureaucratic structure prevented it from responding quickly to threatsSenior management was unable to convince middle managers to move away from their analog, chemical and film mindsetManagement was distracted by foreign competition (e.g. Fuji) in film and a suit by Polaroid on instant photographyKodak exhibited a certain amount of arrogance thinking that it could control the pace at which consumers converted from film to digital photographyThe company wanted to protect its cash cow film business as long as possibleOver the years Kodak tried to diversify into unrelated fields and then pulled outOne hundred-plus years of success and a market share that at times exceeded 90 percent 'Kodak Should Have Folded Earlier'

Brent Goldfarb, associate professor of entrepreneurship and management, recently co-authored "Optimal Inertia: When Organizations Should Fail" in the journal Ecology and Strategy. He says Kodak is one such company that should have "failed," or closed down in an orderly fashion, instead of turning to bankruptcy. Contact him at 301-405-9672 or bgoldfarb@rhsmith.umd.edu.

Goldfarb's position, detailed in this Smith YouTube Channel video, is summarized here:

"Kodak was faced with a particularly difficult problem. The production of film is a very sensitive process, and for this reason Kodak was a rigid organization - small mistakes could have large consequences. This made the transition to digital costly. Ironically, Kodak was reasonably successful in their transition and quickly achieved a market leading position. The problem was that market leadership in a low-margin business is not a great prize. Kodak was not a victim of poor management, rather, the poor circumstance of being on the wrong side of creative destruction; its fate largely unavoidable.

Instead of trying to pursue the digital photography market, (Kodak) would have been better off slowly shutting down while profiting as much as possible from the dying film market. While this is a terrible outcome for Kodak stakeholders, particularly employees, history did not treat the company kindly anyway. They might have been better off trying to provide enough resources to the employees being displaced and to those managing the shrinking enterprise so as to ensure continuity and thereby extracting as much profit as possible from the market. They could then return what's left to the shareholders, whose dividends are increased further with the company not plowing money back into research and development."

About the Robert H. Smith School of Business
The Robert H. Smith School of Business is an internationally recognized leader in management education and research. One of 12 colleges and schools at the University of Maryland, College Park, the Smith School offers undergraduate, full-time and part-time MBA, executive MBA, MS in business, PhD and executive education programs, as well as outreach services to the corporate community. The school offers its degree, custom and certification programs in learning locations in North America and Asia.


View the original article here

Wednesday, 7 August 2013

Media Alert: July 31, 2013 - Facebook Stock Rebound: UMD-Smith Expert Comments

MEDIA ALERT: July 31, 2013
Attention: Finance Reporters

Facebook Stock Rebound: UMD-Smith Expert Comments

COLLEGE PARK, Md. - David Kass, Tyser Teaching Fellow in finance at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business, comments on Facebook’s price per share rebounding to near its $38 IPO level (from May 2012) after trading as low as $17.55 last September.

The Smith School has an in-house facility for live or taped interviews via fiber-optic line for television or multimedia content.

"The reason for this increase is a much better-than-expected earnings report. Revenues and profits were higher than analyst forecasts, especially for mobile users. Revenue increased 53 percent versus second quarter 2012, while operating profit increased 54 percent. Revenue from advertising ($1.6 billion) represented 88 percent of total revenue and a 61 percent increase from the same quarter last year. Mobile advertising revenue represented 41 percent of advertising revenue for second quarter 2013.

"If Facebook can continue to grow its advertising revenues rapidly, especially in the high growth mobile area, the outlook for its stock performance is very good. However, Facebook's price-earnings ratio, which exceeds 50:1, leaves little room for disappointment.”

Kass has held senior positions with the Federal Trade Commission, General Accounting Office, Department of Defense, and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. His teaching includes advanced financial management and business finance, and he has launched a Smith School “Warren Buffett” blog. He has appeared on Bloomberg TV, CNBC, PBS Nightly Business Report and others.

Phone/Email: 301-405-9683, dkass@rhsmith.umd.edu
Bio: www.rhsmith.umd.edu/finance/faculty/kass.aspx
Twitter: twitter.com/DrDavidKass

About the University of Maryland's Robert H. Smith School of Business
The Robert H. Smith School of Business is an internationally recognized leader in management education and research. One of 12 colleges and schools at the University of Maryland, College Park, the Smith School offers undergraduate, full-time and part-time MBA, executive MBA, online MBA, MS in business, PhD and executive education programs, as well as outreach services to the corporate community. The school offers its degree, custom and certification programs in learning locations in North America and Asia.


View the original article here

Wednesday, 31 July 2013

Public quizzed on media ownership

30 July 2013 Last updated at 14:34 GMT Press photographers The world's news environment has changed radically in recent years The government is holding a public consultation on UK media ownership of newspapers, TV, radio and online.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) has published the consultation "to question how media plurality should be measured".

It said this was to "ensure the media landscape isn't dominated by too few organisations".

The consultation will also ask whether the BBC, which is publicly funded, should be included.

The process is open until 22 October.

Government policy on this issue usually focuses on ensuring that there is a wide-range of viewpoints available across various platforms.

The 27-page document is aimed at inviting views on new ways to measure plurality in a news environment radically different to when the current model was established, early in the last decade.

The consultation asks the public what media it should include in its study i.e. TV, radio, web content and what genres it should cover.

Top news channels

The consultation said the publicly-funded BBC's "impact on plurality" needed to be assessed.

"The BBC is estimated to have spent about £430m on news and current affairs output during 2011 - more than the remaining UK television and radio news broadcasters combined," it said.

Under the current regime, the secretary of state may intervene to block mergers where there is a public interest concern about the impact on plurality.

TV and radio licences are also barred from people whose influence may be of "concern", such as advertising agencies.

Public service broadcasters have a range of further obligations, while TV and radio broadcasts are subject to rules on due accuracy and impartiality.

Data in the consultation report said that while the BBC produces 25% of the news broadcast on television, it accounts for 73% of TV news viewing.

Across all platforms, the BBC reaches 86% of people who read or watch news content - compared with 40% for ITV, 28% for Sky and 27% for News Corp.

Media ownership rules

And among the top 20 news channels across platforms, BBC One reaches 65% of adults, 37% ITV, 23% for both Sky and the BBC News website, followed by the BBC News Channel on 22%, the Sun on 16% and BBC Radio 4 on 14%.

Social media such as Facebook and Twitter are also a key consideration of the consultation, along with online aggregators such as Google News. The algorithms used to draw up the list of content, will also be subject to the consultation.

The document also stated that the current media ownership rules "only apply to newspapers, television and radio", adding that "they do not extend to other media organisations that only operate in the online sphere - such as the Huffington Post".

It said that for news consumption, 41% of adults in the UK now regularly access news via the internet. This has this has grown from just 15% in 2002, according to 2012's report from Ofcom on news consumption in the UK.

Much online content is "generated by media organisations that used to reach their audience via another medium eg newspaper or TV" the document said, adding that the internet "has also created an outlet for new voices to reach the public, including a myriad of individual, smaller voices that can be heard, for example through blogs".

Reforms to the way media plurality was calculated were recommended in the wake of the proposed merger of News Corp and BSkyB in 2011 and later by Lord Justice Leveson's report into the culture, practice and ethics of the press.

The consultation said that "online publication should be included within the scope of any new measurement framework for plurality".

Other measures in the document include calling on TV platforms to "end the charging of public service broadcasters to feature on those platforms, in recognition of the value audiences place on that content being available".

Currently, the BBC, for example, has to pay Sky for Sky to carry its programming and listings.


View the original article here